Skip to main content

Dedicated time for learning Python at work

In the spring of 2019 I had the opportunity to use some paid work time for learning something new.
I decided to spend the given time to brush up on my Python knowledge. I had some experience in programming with Python but not much and I didn't have a understanding of Python conventions or ecosystem.

Limited time frame

I had a limited time frame that was split to four sessions. In addition to the time given for each session I spent at least the same amount of time on preparing each session.

First session, the basics

It was quite hard to find a resource that summarised Python basics on a sufficient level but I managed to find Alex Martinelli's slides Python for Programmers from 2007 that contained exactly what I was looking for.
Even though the slides are from over a decade ago and the Python version was 2.x at that time all the information is still applicable to current Python 3.x version as is or with minor changes.

Second session, testing in Python

Python has a good support for automated tests and it wasn't too hard to find two good resources where to learn. First I read a short introduction to Python's unit testing libraries from the Hitchhiker's guide to Python. After that I went through a longer, more profound, tutorial from Real Python.

Third session, functional programming in Python

I knew that Python supported functional programming concepts and the best resource that I could find was Python's own documentation that also explained some of the gotchas I ran into in my earlier Python programming experiments e.g. map function returns a iterator not a list or set or what ever was the input's type.

Fourth and final session, asynchronous programming in Python

With the rise of FRP and the Reactive Manifesto I thought that introducing myself to Python's async IO would be a good idea. For me the Real Python's tutorial on async IO was the easiest to understand and I think it's quite comprehensive.

Syllabus for Python for programmers

  1. Basics, Alex Martinelli's slides http://www.aleax.it/goo_py4prog.pdf 
  2. Testing, the Hitchhiker's guide to Python https://docs.python-guide.org/writing/tests/ and Real Python's getting started with testing in Python https://realpython.com/python-testing/ 
  3. Functional programming, Python's own documentation https://docs.python.org/3.7/howto/functional.html 
  4. Async IO, Real Python's tutorial on async IO https://realpython.com/async-io-python/

Conclusion

It took me around 6 hours to read and somewhat understand the contents of all the resources of the sessions. I already knew Python's syntax and had a solid understanding of other programming languages and I knew all the concepts that were covered.

I haven't worked with Python since the sessions but next time that I will, I'll first browse through these resorces.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Simple code: Naming things

There are two hard things in programming and naming is one them. If you don't believe me ask Martin Fowler https://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/TwoHardThings.html . In this post I'll be covering some general conventions for naming things to improve readability and understandabilty of the code. There are lots of things that need a name in programming. Starting from higher abstractions to lower we need to name a project, API or library, we probably need to name the source code repository, when we get to the code we need to name our modules or packages, we give names to classes, objects, interfaces and in those we name our functions or methods and within those we name our variables. Overall a lot of things to name. TLDR; Basic rule There's a single basic convention to follow to achiveve better, more descriptive naming of things. Give it a meaningful name i.e. don't use shorthands like gen or single letter variables like a, x, z instead tell what it represents, what it does...
Read more

Simple code: Integration tests

Integration test is something that tests a functionality that is dependant on a external system e.g. a database, HTTP API or message queue. Integration vs unit tests The line is thin in my opinion. The integration part can be faked or a embedded services can be used in place of the actual integration point and with these solutions the interaction with the external system is bounded in the test context and the tests can be executed in isolation so they are very much like unit tests. The only difference with this type of integration test and unit test is that the startup time of the embedded or faked system usually takes some seconds and that adds total execution time of the tests. Even though the total test exection time is longer all the tests need to pass and all the cases need to be covered whether there's external systems involved or not so the importance is equal between the test types. This is why I wouldn't separate unit and integration tests from each other within the co...
Read more

Sharing to help myself

It's been a while since my last post but I have a good excuse. I've been in a new customer project (well new for me) for two months now and have absorbed a lot of new information on the technology stack and the project itself. This time I'll be sharing a short post about sharing code and how it can help the one who's sharing the code. I'll be giving a real life example of how it happened to me. My story Back when I was implementing first version of my simple-todo REST-service I used Scala and Play framework for the service and specs2 for testing the implementation. Since then I've done a few other implementations of the service but I've continued to use specs2 as a testing framework. I wrote about my implementation and shared the post through various services and as a result someone forked my work and gave me some pointers on how I could improve my tests. That someone was Eric Torreborre  the man behind specs2 framework. I didn't take his ref...
Read more